Saxtransformerfactory validating feature

-- Viele Grüße / best regards Marc Pellmann _______________________________ inubit - the integration experts inubit AG Lützowstraße 105-106 D-10785 Berlin Fon: 49.30. 72 61 12-100 Freecall: 0800-go inubit Web: you possibly send me an example of this that I can reproduce?=20 It's not entirely implausible that the behaviour is different with and without a trace listener, since compiling in trace calls is done before = the static type analysis.* @return a Features read from the input stream * @throws Parser Configuration Exception is the SAX parser can not be configured * @throws SAXException if there is an xml problem * @throws JAXBException if the xml cannot be marshalled into a T.*/ public static Features unmarshal(Input Stream in,boolean validate) /** * Make doc item.[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marc = Pellmann Sent: 27 January 2005 To: [email protected] If they are necessary than the branch above needs to go from this: if (number Of Nodes * 3 with Saxon 8.2 - I know there were problems in 8.1 that were fixed. It certainly seems on the surface that = there is enough information available to do the binding using type information that's available statically.Subject: Re: [saxon] error in java calls from xslt script () Michael Kay schrieb:=20 I'll have a look at this one. I'm looking at the code and node Kind is length 50 and number Of Nodes is also 50. Can you confirm that this is with Saxon 8.2 = - I know there were problems in 8.1 that were fixed.For simple functions like these it's probably best to write them in XSLT or XQuery; for more complex function you can consider writing them in Java. As below, just a rough idea: for $item in doc("file:///c:/F.xml")//f; where  synonym($item/element_name, "photo") return <result> </result> another matter is i've got a error message from java application: "A sequence of more than one item is not allowed as the first argument of lower-case()" it seems the function allows to parse no more than one element node. [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marc = Pellmann Sent: 28 January 2005 To: [email protected]

saxtransformerfactory validating feature-41saxtransformerfactory validating feature-54saxtransformerfactory validating feature-76saxtransformerfactory validating feature-17

I tried changing my system clock to New York time, apart from invalidating my IDE's cache this made no difference.is it possible to develop and extend the functions to Saxon packages? I'd relied on this to route around the JAXP Xalan annoyances. The Script --- Example Java Source --- public class Formatter And you could add the new XSLTTrace Listener() to reproduce.As below, just a rough idea: for $item in doc("file:///c:/F.xml")//f where synonym($item/element_name, "photo") return another matter is i've got a error message from java application: "A sequence of more than one item is not allowed as the first argument of lower-case()" it seems the function allows to parse no more than one element node. --=20 Viele Gr=FC=DFe / best regards Marc Pellmann _______________________________ inubit - the integration experts inubit AG L=FCtzowstra=DFe 105-106 D-10785 Berlin Fon: 49.30. 72 61 12-100 Freecall: 0800-go inubit Web: Java Source --- public class Formatter And you could add the new XSLTTrace Listener() to reproduce.Michael Kay If you feel there is a need for such functions, please feel free to develop them, and if they are useful enough I might consider shipping them with the product. Hi all, Has anyone been thinking about customised functins like synonym() or antonym()? just in case that we have to handle with string elements. | I have come to believe that the whole | world is an enigma, a harmless enigma | that is made terrible by our own mad | attempt to interpret it as though it | had an underlying truth.--Umberto Eco &aid=3D1111380&group_id=3D29872&atid=3D397617 =20 Thanks for reporting it.Generally though, there is lots of opportunity for specialized function libraries to be developed for use with Saxon (or with XSLT and XQuery generally). is it possible to develop and extend the functions to Saxon packages? =20 Michael Kay _____ =20 From: [email protected]

Leave a Reply

  1. Sexy chat by mail id 16-Apr-2020 09:16

    In fact, people who meet their partners online are not more likely to break up — they don’t have more transitory relationships.